← All traditions

Liberalhigh confidence

Minarchism / right-libertarianism

Peak influence 1971–

Core claim

The state is justified only for the functions that cannot be provided without coercion — courts, police, defence — and every function beyond those is an unjustified transfer.

What it wants the state to do

Wants constitutional limits with teeth, a flat or consumption tax base, drug and vice laws repealed, occupational licensing abolished, and no industrial policy. Wants defence, but sized for defence.

Historical success case

Deregulation of US airlines and freight from 1978 onward, which is broadly credited across the political spectrum with large durable falls in real transport prices.

Historical failure mode

Financial deregulation through the 1990s and 2000s, where the removal of prudential constraint preceded the 2008 crisis — the standard evidence that some markets have failure modes that liability rules do not price.

Nearby traditions

Classical liberalism, its direct ancestor; anarcho-capitalism, which regards the retained night-watchman state as an unprincipled exception.

Common mix-up

Consistent libertarianism is not a reliable ally of social conservatism. The same premise that voids business regulation voids drug prohibition, immigration restriction and censorship — which is why the coalition it sits in fractures regularly.

Coordinates

AxisValueReads as
Identity+0.00balanced
Pace+0.350.35 toward Radical
Economic+0.880.88 toward Individual / market
Authority-0.850.85 toward Liberty
Nation-0.300.30 toward Cosmopolitan
Democracy-0.500.50 toward Democratic
Religion-0.400.40 toward Secular
Technology+0.500.50 toward Transhumanist
Ecology-0.550.55 toward Growth
Military-0.550.55 toward Non-intervention
Class-0.550.55 toward Harmony
Rationalism-0.450.45 toward Sceptical

See where this sits in the cube

Ideology coordinates in v1 are editorial priors for teaching geometry, not a peer-reviewed embedding. Nothing here is fitted to manifesto data, roll-call scores or survey coordinates. Later versions could be; this one is not, and says so. Read the methodology.