Anchors

20 traditions

Each entry is a dossier on a tradition, not a verdict on the people who hold it. Grouped by intellectual lineage — which is why Marxism–Leninism and democratic socialism share a family while sitting at opposite ends of the authority axis.

Liberal

Individual rights prior to collective claims; power divided and limited by law.

Classical liberalismhigh confidence

Individuals are the authors of their own ends, and a government's only warrant is to protect that authorship — chiefly through property, contract and equality before the law.

1776–1870 · E 0.72 · A -0.62 · I 0.05

Minarchism / right-libertarianismhigh confidence

The state is justified only for the functions that cannot be provided without coercion — courts, police, defence — and every function beyond those is an unjustified transfer.

1971– · E 0.88 · A -0.85 · I 0.00

Progressivism / social liberalismhigh confidence

Formal liberty is worth little without the capability to use it, so the state should actively remove the material and social barriers — poverty, discrimination, ill health, ignorance — that make rights nominal.

1900–1920; 1960– · E -0.30 · A 0.15 · I -0.80

Third-way / market liberalismhigh confidence

The ownership argument is settled in the market's favour, so the useful remaining questions are about opportunity, human capital and competent management of a globalised economy.

1992–2008 · E 0.40 · A 0.15 · I -0.35

Socialist

Material inequality is the central political fact; the economy is a public question.

Social democracyhigh confidence

Capitalism produces more than any alternative and distributes worse than is tolerable, so the market should be kept and its output heavily taxed, insured and redistributed by democratic consent.

1945–1980 · E -0.45 · A 0.05 · I -0.40

Democratic socialismmedium confidence

Ownership of productive assets should pass to the public or to workers, and this can and must be achieved through elections rather than through a vanguard seizure of the state.

1900–1930; revived 2015– · E -0.75 · A -0.05 · I -0.50

Marxism–Leninismdisputed

History moves by class struggle, the working class cannot reach revolutionary consciousness unaided, and so a disciplined vanguard party must take and hold state power on its behalf.

1917–1989 · E -0.92 · A 0.85 · I -0.10

Maoismmedium confidence

In agrarian societies the peasantry, not the industrial proletariat, is the revolutionary class — and class struggle continues after the revolution, inside the party itself, or the revolution is lost.

1949–1976 · E -0.90 · A 0.85 · I -0.15

Left-populismdisputed

The central political division is between a broad people and a narrow elite that has captured the state, and politics is the work of building the people into a majority that can take it back.

1999– · E -0.60 · A 0.20 · I -0.35

Conservative

Inherited institutions carry knowledge that reformers cannot reconstruct.

Anarchist

The state's monopoly on force is itself the problem, whatever it is used for.

Authoritarian-national

The nation as an organic unit, defended by a strong executive against internal division.

Religious-integral

Political authority answers to religious truth, not only to the governed.

Green / technocratic

Policy set by measured constraint and expert administration rather than by contest.

Ideology coordinates in v1 are editorial priors for teaching geometry, not a peer-reviewed embedding. Nothing here is fitted to manifesto data, roll-call scores or survey coordinates. Later versions could be; this one is not, and says so. Read the methodology.